If you want to buy one right now then I would go for it. Even when the new cards come out they will initially be in short supply, maybe have issues, maybe the price will be inflated - it takes a few months for things to settle. So if you don't mind waiting until next year then sure, wait, otherwise buy that 1660!
Compared to previous generations, the GTX 1660 Super (or 1660S) is significantly more powerful than the GTX 1060 and AMD's RX 590, 580, and 570, so it's also a suitable upgrade for current owners of those graphics cards. All in all, the GTX 1660S is a great choice for 1080p gaming.
NO, The GTX 1660 super is not future proof.
One chart it provided suggests a 10-20 percent increase over the GTX 1660 could be achievable. The GTX 1650 Super bests its predecessor in every way. It offers 43-percent more CUDA cores at 1,280, with a base clock of 1,530MHz and a boost clock of 1,725MHz, compared to the original's 1,485MHz base and 1,665MHz boost.
In particular we will see how well this graphics card runs on Ultra settings on 1080p resolution as well as 1440p and 4K. Gaming at 1440p with the GeForce GTX 1660 Super 6GB is a solid choice of hardware for increased screen resolution gaming.
For 1080p 144hz gaming, the Nvidia GTX 1660 is the least powerful GPU we would recommend. In newer titles or more greedy titles, you will likely need to lower settings to maintain an FPS close to 144hz, but for eSports titles or older games, we expect the 1660 to perform well even with medium graphics settings.
It is clear that the GTX 1660 SUPER is a significantly more capable high-end card that can play AAA titles at 1080p/1440p with 50-60 frames per second. The price/performance ratio is excellent for GTX 1660 SUPER against the competition in budget mid-range cards.
No not really. The 2080 and 2080 super are great for 1080p high fps gaming. If you want 1080 60 sure you can get by with weaker cards but you'll have to lower graphics settings to do so.
If Ray Tracing is heavily implemented it might be a problem for RTX 2060 at the end of 2 years. For the next 3 years, for sure its good for 1080p high/ultra 60+ fps. Currently its overkill for 1080p gaming actually with GTX 1660 Super being the better value.
It is not overkill for 1080p,and will max out any game in 1080p high framerate. You could get by witha 2060 in most games at 1080p wit max settings over 100fps, but not in the most recent titles. The 2070 is perfect for 1080p 144hz and can even crank some games to 1440p or 4k in older titles.
Nvidia claims most of the top spots for performance, with the Radeon VII and RX 5700 XT coming in below the RTX 2070 Super and GTX 1080 Ti, but above the RTX 2060. That's how far behind AMD is; unfortunately: its latest GPUs end up being a hair slower than Nvidia's nearly 3-years-old card.
Probably the biggest difference between the two is power consumption, with the RX 590 drawing a great deal more power than the GTX 1660. The frame-rate advantage may not be much, but the GTX 1660 draws less power, which will save you money in the long haul.
If it can, though, the RTX 2060 is about 10-15 percent faster on average and sometimes around 20 percent, while costing 25 percent more, and it has RTX features to boot. It makes more sense to pick the RTX 2060 over the GTX 1660 Ti if building a new PC, as opposed to just upgrading your GPU alone.
In the cases of these games, the GeForce RTX 2060 is the clear winner, due to the fact that on top of performing right in line with its price-to-power ratio, it also includes the Tensor and ray-tracing cores that the GTX 1660 Ti purposefully lacks.
Nvidia's RTX 2080 is a better card utilizing newer technology and offering better, faster performance than the GTX 1080 Ti and usually at a much lower cost. There will be some games that perform better with the GTX 1080 Ti, but that advantage is not worth hundreds of dollars.
